立即注册找回密码

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

微信登录

微信扫一扫,快速登录

手机动态码快速登录

手机号快速注册登录

搜索

图文播报

查看: 157|回复: 5

[分享] 消费者的品牌忠诚度是如何形成的?

[复制链接]
发表于 2025-1-3 10:37 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2025-1-3 10:38 | 显示全部楼层
“高价值的客户像皮球一样被各个部门踢来踢去,他们的问题很难得到解决。”   
Why Customer Loyalty Programs Can Backfire





客户忠诚度计划无处不在,仅在美国,各种各样的会员计划就超过了33 亿。会员可以令品牌拥有巨大优势:会员更有可能在自己所属的零售商消费,逛网站或实体店的次数更频繁,更有可能下载品牌的官方应用、在社交媒体上关注品牌或互动,并推荐给家人和朋友。
Customer loyalty programs are ubiquitous, accounting for more than 3.3 billion memberships in the United States alone. And they can confer tremendous advantage: Members are more likely than others to buy from a retailer whose program they belong to, they visit the website or store more frequently, and they are more likely to download the retailer’s app, follow or otherwise engage with the retailer on social media, and recommend it to family and friends.

但是,沃顿大学教授与客户体验咨询公司维德集团(Verde Group)一起进行的新研究揭示了忠诚度计划的一大缺点。当忠诚的会员未能享受到满意的服务——遇到运输问题、退货问题、库存问题等——他们比非会员更沮丧。他们在品牌的消费比非会员频繁,所以也会更经常遇到这样的问题;由于新冠疫情,网上购物激增,服务问题更为普遍,进一步推动忠诚度计划会造成重大损害。研究人员称之为反向效应,品牌煞费苦心培养的忠诚度会反过来损害品牌。
But new research, conducted by professors at the Wharton School along with the customer experience consultancy the Verde Group, reveals an important downside of loyalty programs. When loyal members encounter service failures—shipping issues, problems with returns, stockouts, and the like—they get more upset than customers who are not members of the program. Because they shop the brand more frequently than nonmembers do, they experience such problems more often; and the pandemic-fueled increase in online shopping, where service failures are more prevalent, has compounded the problem to the point where loyalty programs are causing significant damage. The researchers call this the boomerang effect, because the very loyalty a brand engenders comes back to hurt it.

“这对零售商来说是个现实问题,”沃顿贝克零售中心学术主任、该研究报告的作者之一托马斯·罗伯逊(Thomas Robertson)说,“企业正在无意中杀死自己的摇钱树。”
“This is a real problem for retailers,” says Thomas Robertson, the academic director of the Baker Retailing Center at Wharton and one of the study’s authors. “Businesses are inadvertently killing their golden geese.”

研究人员在2020年2月对5000多名美国零售消费者开展了问卷调查,在新冠疫情暴发后的5月又调查了2500名消费者。结果显示,忠诚度计划的会员不仅比其他购物者遭遇更多服务摩擦,而且更难解决问题。例如,5 月份接受忠诚度调查的会员表示,平均需要与公司联系4 次,耗费 5.1天的时间才能解决问题。非会员则只需联系2.8 次,耗时3.3天。
The researchers surveyed more than 5,000 U.S. retail consumers in February 2020 and an additional 2,500 in May, after the pandemic took hold. The results showed that members of loyalty programs not only experienced more service friction than other shoppers but were more likely to struggle to have their issues resolved. For instance, loyalty members surveyed in May required an average of four contacts with the company before reaching a solution, and the process took 5.1 days. Nonmembers needed just 2.8 contacts and 3.3 days.

“高价值的客户像皮球一样被各个部门踢来踢去,他们的问题很难得到解决。”维德集团CEO、该研究报告的作者之一保拉·考特尼(Paula Courtney)说。部分问题在于,要投诉的会员通常会先拨打电话专线,才知道会员专线没有权限。会员对自己应得的服务有着较高期望,因此这种结果尤其具有破坏性。另一个问题是,会员经常想要确认自己的积分或奖励被妥善记录,这通常意味着他们会被推回到会员或营销部门。“这些客户的待遇跟非会员没什么区别,这让他们很恼火。”考特尼说。
研究人员提出了三个缓解反向效应的步骤。




“These highly valuable customers are getting bounced around between different departments and are struggling to get resolution,” says Paula Courtney, CEO of the Verde Group and a coauthor of the study. Part of the problem is that members who have a complaint often begin by calling a dedicated number, only to learn that the loyalty department is not empowered to help them. That’s especially damaging given that members have high expectations for how they should be served. Another issue is that members frequently need to ensure that the points or rewards they have earned are properly accounted for, which often means they are bounced back to the loyalty or marketing department. “These customers aren’t getting anything close to white-glove treatment, and that is frustrating them,” Courtney says.
The researchers suggest three steps to mitigate the boomerang effect.

识别破坏性最大的问题。在审视客户消费过程时,零售商不应只关注最常见的服务问题。“不要让吱吱作响的车轮分散注意力,”罗伯逊说,“最常见的摩擦和问题不一定最紧要。调查显示,10个最常见的服务问题和10个导致忠诚度下降最大的问题之间没有重叠,这是由净推荐值(Net Promoter Scores)计算得出的结论。受访者在2月和5月最常提到的三个问题都与商品的供应量有关。而在疫情暴发前的调查中,破坏性最大的三个问题则与查找和购买商品的效率有关。在疫情期间,破坏性最大的问题是退货必须支付运费、有原始收据才能退货,以及在浏览网站时遇到问题。
Understand which problems are the most damaging.

As they audit the customer journey, retailers should avoid the temptation to blindly focus on the most frequent service failures. “Don’t get distracted by the squeaky wheel,” Robertson says. “Your most common sources of friction aren’t necessarily the ones that need immediate attention.” Indeed, the surveys revealed no overlap between the 10 most frequent service failures and the 10 that caused the biggest erosion in loyalty, as measured by Net Promoter Scores. The three problems most often cited by respondents in both February and May related to items’ availability. The three most destructive in the pre-pandemic survey had to do with finding and purchasing items efficiently. During the pandemic, the most destructive issues were having to pay for return shipping, needing an original receipt to make a return, and experiencing problems navigating the website.

罗伯逊解释说,忠诚度计划的隐藏含义是:品牌对会员是重要的,会员对品牌也是重要的。缺货这样的问题虽然很恼人,但并不特别具有破坏性,因为并没有违背忠诚度计划的本意。但要求会员退货时支付运费并提供原始收据,表明品牌并不知道他们的身份,也不信任他们,更不在意能不能让他们购物更方便。
Implicit in a loyalty program’s contract, Robertson explains, is an understanding that just as the brand is special to members, members are special to the brand. While failures such as stockouts are annoying, they aren’t particularly destructive because they don’t violate that contract. But asking members to pay for return shipping and provide an original receipt signals that the company doesn’t know who they are, doesn’t trust them, and doesn’t care about making it easy for them to do business.

提供防止“脱粉”的福利。在疫情暴发前和期间,面对服务问题时,部分会员特权有助于减轻不满情绪:及时获取限时供应或独家活动邀请等内幕信息,免费寄送与退货,购买返现,心仪商品的发售提醒,查看购物记录权限,以及Alexa或谷歌助理通知订单和发货状态。研究人员说,这些福利往往会让会员感到自己得到了重视,缓解购物时的挫折感,如同常旅客福利可以缓解与旅行有关的小摩擦一样。考特尼说:“你在贵宾休息室里品着香槟时,可能就不太在意行李延误。”相比之下,当问题出现时,会员价和赠品等福利对提高会员忠诚度的作用微乎其微。
Deliver on the benefits that can protect against defections.

Several loyalty program perks tempered dissatisfaction in the face of service failures both before and during the pandemic: insider access to information such as limited-time offers or invitations to exclusive events, free shipping and returns, cash back for purchases, alerts when desired items went on sale, access to one’s shopping history, and Alexa or Google Assistant notifications about order and shipping status. Those benefits tend to make loyalty members feel valued, the researchers say, and they can temper shopping frustrations much as frequent-flier perks can assuage travel-related glitches. “You’re less likely to mind having your baggage delayed if you’re sipping champagne in the arrivals lounge,” Courtney says. Benefits such as special member pricing and gifts, by contrast, did little to shore up loyalty when problems arose.

将忠诚计划与整体战略和流程相结合。与其只在市场营销部门实施忠诚度计划,品牌更应该将其与运营、技术和财务部门整合,实现快速通畅的售后理赔。例如,如果忠诚度计划没有利用销售终端技术来识别回头客,就无法实现流畅的退货体验。其他破坏性的服务问题,比如电话客服态度粗鲁,如果会员部门没有能力在企业运营层面推动改变,就无法补救——比如客服态度不好,应对措施可以是让企业重新评估人员配备和调整培训重点。
Integrate loyalty programs with overall strategy and processes.

Rather than silo loyalty programs within marketing departments, retailers should integrate them into operations, technology, and finance to facilitate swift, streamlined service recoveries. Seamless returns, for example, aren’t possible if a loyalty program doesn’t utilize point-of-sale technology that recognizes repeat customers. Other damaging service failures, such as rudeness from reps answering the phones, can’t be remedied if the loyalty department is powerless to drive operational changes—in the case of rude reps, by pushing for a reappraisal of staffing and training priorities, for example.

疫情消退后,网上购物的热潮很可能会持续下去,虽然一些相关的服务问题应该会随着公司调整得到解决,但公司仍需要关注和管理忠诚度计划的负面影响。罗伯逊表示:“没有零售商承受得起失去最有价值的顾客的后果。反向效应敦促品牌要加紧解决会加剧会员流失的问题,并投资可以减轻损失的会员福利。”
The boom in online shopping is likely to continue after the pandemic abates, and while some of the associated service problems should smooth out as once-deluged companies adjust, firms will still need to monitor and manage any backlash from their loyalty programs. “No retailer can afford to lose its most valuable customers,” Robertson says. “The boomerang effect shows the urgency of tackling problems that specifically aggravate loyalty members and investing in benefits that can mitigate the damage.”
关于本研究  《新现实:理解零售消费者在疫情期间的体验》(The New Reality: Understanding the Retail Consumer Experience Duringa Pandemic),托马斯·罗伯逊、保拉·考特尼(研究报告)。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2025-1-3 10:38 | 显示全部楼层
我们常提到的品牌忠诚度,指的是消费者对于品牌毫无保留的支持,没有条件的忠诚。忠诚度是一个非常大的不确定因素,是随时可能流失的强大资源。
没有人生来就钟爱某个产品,或某个品牌,从陌生受众到忠实粉丝是一个伴随受众认知增加而演变的漫长过程。而流失率是品牌绕不开的话题,守业更比创业难,并不是曾经拥有的就能一直拥有。无论是百年老店还是新生品牌,消费者认定后,并不一定会此生追随,其中,大部分消费者会随时改变看法,不作为的品牌,在时间的一轮轮洗礼后,一批一批的消费者不断流失。
所以,没有品质,就没有忠诚 ,信任是成功的基石,品质是忠诚的基础。忠诚消费者既是挑刺的,也 是包容的。对于自己所钟爱的品牌,他们会表现出非常明显的冲突心理,一方面出于喜爱,他们能够包容品牌产品或服务出现的某些瑕疵;另一方面出于厚望,他们总是希望所得的产品或服务是最好最快的。因此,但凡是品牌忠诚消费者,他们善于拿其他品牌与喜爱的品牌对比,同时也热衷于支持热衷品牌的各种营销活动。但每位忠诚消费者的内心都有一条隐形的底线,那就是产品或服务的品质,这是每一个品牌都不可逾越的。
俗话说,没有卖不出去的货,只有不会卖货的人。任何看似偶然的事 情都有其必然性。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2025-1-3 10:39 | 显示全部楼层
品牌忠诚度是品牌价值的核心。它由五级构成:
1、 无品牌忠诚者
这一层消费者会不断更换品牌,对品牌没有认同,对价格非常敏感。哪个价格低就选哪个,许多低值易耗品,同质化行业和习惯性消费品都没有什么忠诚品牌。
品牌忠诚度
品牌忠诚度 图册
2、习惯购买者
这一层消费者忠于某一品牌或某几种品牌,有固定的消费习惯和偏好,购买时心中有数,目标明确。如果竞争者有明显的诱因,如价格优惠、广告宣传、独特包装,销售促进等方式鼓励消费者试用。让其购买或续购某一产品,就会进行品牌转换购买其他品牌。
3、满意购买者
这一层的消费者对原有消费者的品牌已经相当满意,而且已经产生了品牌转换风险忧虑,也就是说购买另一个新的品牌,会有风险,会有效益的风险,适应上的风险等。
4、情感购买者
这一层的消费者对品牌已经有一种爱和情感,某些品牌是他们情感与心灵的依托,如一些消费者天天用中华牙膏、雕牌肥皂,一些小朋友天天喝的娃哈哈奶,可口可乐改配方招致了游行大军等等,能历久不衰,就是已经成为消费者的朋友,生活中不可缺的用品、且不易被取代。
5、忠诚购买者
这一层是品牌忠诚的最高境界,消费者不仅对品牌产生情感,甚至引以为骄傲。如欧米茄表、宝马车、劳斯莱斯车、梦特娇服装、鳄鱼服饰、耐克鞋的购买者都持有这种心态。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2025-1-3 10:40 | 显示全部楼层
消费者品牌忠诚度形成的关键,概括而言,就是——品牌价值的体验性。
品牌价值的体验,有三个核心层面,即物理层面——包括产品功能、质量及价格;心理层面——消费者品牌价值的心理预期以及消费者自我价值定位;以及社会层面——消费者的社会身份认同感与社会圈层归属感。
当这三个核心层面相互间越趋于高度契合,消费者对该品牌的忠诚度就越趋牢固,反之,则难以形成。如图:


其中,在物理层面,产品的使用功能、工艺质量以及配套的服务,包括产品造型、包装以及功能性组合等要素,共同构成品牌的实体价值,这是消费者认同该品牌的基础。价格则是对品牌实体价值的货币量化,将直接作用于消费者心理价值预期——价格越高,消费者对产品的价值预期也就越高。
同时,价格首先与消费者自我价值定位相联系,两者趋同性越高,则消费者越容易倾向于选择尝试消费该品牌产品。
所以,价格是引导消费者针对该品牌的价值印象的直观要素。
消费者在特定品牌的消费过程中,除品牌实体价值外,还会感受到由该品牌所带来的社会身份的评价,这种评价与消费者自我价值定位越趋吻合,则其自身感受到的社会身份认同感与社会圈层归属感就越高(社会现实评价),由此,品牌所带来的精神价值(或者说品牌所具备的人文价值)就越大,消费者的消费满足感(体验性)也就越强烈。
因此,品牌价值是品牌实体价值与品牌人文价值的叠加;而品牌价值体验体现在消费者对品牌价值的心理预期与社会现实评价的交互印证。
品牌价值与价格之间的对比,形成品牌消费的性价比,性价比越高,越能促进消费者的首次消费决策;
消费者的价值体验与品牌价值之间的对比,形成品牌价值的体验性,体验性越高,越能促进消费者对该品牌的重复消费,由此而确立消费者对品牌的忠诚度。反之,体验性越差,则越不易获得消费者重复消费的选择。
品牌价值影响着消费者最初的消费决策,而品牌价值的体验性,才是消费者产生品牌忠实度的根本。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2025-1-3 10:40 | 显示全部楼层
品牌忠诚度突出表现为消费者的重复购买、连带购买与推荐购买,以及对品牌形象的捍卫。例如,有的消费者买了iPhone后对苹果品牌有了忠诚,不仅再换手机仍然选iPhone,还会把iPad、iWatch等其他产品都买了,更会向其他亲友推荐苹果的产品。当然,我们还看到,“果粉”和其他品牌手机用户之间的争论,这便是品牌忠诚度的表现。
那么,怎样构建品牌忠诚度?关键在于两点:
1、勿忘初心,即确立品牌的定位、个性、价值链、核心诉求等,并长期坚持。
2、将心比心,即强化与客户的沟通互动,让他们感受品牌的荣耀,并使他们持续受益(这一点对渠道商和零售商特别重要)。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册 微信登录 手机动态码快速登录

本版积分规则

关闭

官方推荐 上一条 /3 下一条

快速回复 返回列表 客服中心 搜索 官方QQ群 洽谈合作
快速回复返回顶部 返回列表