立即注册找回密码

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

微信登录

微信扫一扫,快速登录

手机动态码快速登录

手机号快速注册登录

搜索

图文播报

查看: 3365|回复: 0

[国际新闻] 立法者质疑FDA对移动医疗app监管过严

[复制链接]
发表于 2014-6-21 22:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式

登陆有奖并可浏览互动!

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有账号?立即注册 微信登录 手机动态码快速登录

×

pharmon201406211709027606.png

随着移动医疗app和器械的发展,美国立法人员开始反思如何才能更好地管理这一新兴市场。据预测,到2017年电子健康市场将比2013年增长61%达到260亿美元之多。然而FDA现在对于相关app仍然采取过于谨慎的态度。FDA的相关工作人员表示他们在尽全力审查确保那些app不会因为错误使用而造成重大问题。但是立法人员显然不这么看,去年10月份和今年早些时候分别有议员要求FDA澄清其对移动医疗app的管理态度并要求国会明确FDA的具体职责。从这一点来说,美国的立法者似乎对于推动移动医疗市场的发展持积极态度。

详细英文报道:

As mobile medical apps and devices gain market traction, lawmakers are stepping up with questions about how to best regulate the devices.

Global business in "mHealth" technology is predicted to grow 61% from 2013 and bring in $26 billion in revenue by 2017, The Hill reports. But the FDA is still ironing out its oversight of mobile medical apps and faces pushback from lawmakers who want the agency to take a more measured approach.

In September 2013, the FDA rolled out its final rules for companies developing mobile medical apps. The agency said it would exert control over apps designed to work with an already-regulated medical device or ones that transformed a smartphone/tablet into a de facto medical device.

"We have worked hard to strike the right balance, reviewing only the mobile apps that have the potential to harm consumers if they do not function properly," said Jeffrey Shuren, director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (as quoted by The Hill). "Our mobile medical app policy provides app developers with the clarity needed to support the continued development of these important products."

While some mHealth devices are easily regulated--an app that would transform a smartphone into an electrocardiography (ECG) machine, for example, would fall under the FDA's realm--others are not as cut-and-dried. The agency's guidance created a "gray zone" for products that are made for low-risk use but could be used for high-risk purposes and left unanswered questions in the minds of government officials, attorney Bradley Merrill Thompson told The Hill. Some new mobile devices will undoubtedly receive regulatory scrutiny, like blood glucose meters that allow patients to track their glucose levels on smartphones. But others remain in limbo, waiting for a regulatory blessing or curse.

Far from satisfied with the FDA's oversight, lawmakers responded to the agency's initial guidance with bipartisan legislation and lobbying efforts. In October, Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) filed a bill that asked the FDA to clarify its oversight of mobile medical apps. The bill stipulates that the FDA only regulate technology that directly affects patients and prevents mobile medical app makers from going through the regulatory process if their product doesn't carry a high risk.

Earlier this year, a bipartisan congressional group called upon the FDA to clarify its oversight of mobile medical apps. As MobiHealth News reported, 6 U.S. senators issued a letter to the agency stating that "more transparency is needed to avoid stakeholder confusion over how a wider range of medical software might be appropriately regulated." The note listed 9 questions, including inquiries about how the FDA regulates an app with an unclassified or complex function.

Thompson said the industry is waiting on the sidelines to see how the legislative debate plays out, but that action from lawmakers could have negative implications for companies' emerging business.

"Frankly what the issues are today will be different from what the issues are tomorrow because the technology is moving so quickly that freezing it in legislation would be very problematic," he said.

来源:生物谷


楼主热帖
回复

使用道具 举报

发表回复

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册 微信登录 手机动态码快速登录

本版积分规则

关闭

官方推荐 上一条 /3 下一条

快速回复 返回列表 客服中心 搜索 官方QQ群 洽谈合作
快速回复返回顶部 返回列表